Jakub Ferencik
1 min readMay 10, 2021

--

Thank you for your critique.

Although, your response was certainly rambling, it lacked coherence, and all in all was in no related to anything I said in my short piece.

If you are to criticize my piece, then criticize the writing in it. Why add so much unnecessary blabber? You do like wasting my time, it seems. I never mention Hegel's theological leanings ... I never mention that he was a morally exemplary model for our society (he was an avid proponent of colonialism which you so conveniently left out -- are you familiar with him at all?) ... and why mention his discussion of monarchy? I mean.. I do not talk about that in my piece.

I am sure Hegel himself would dislike my 4 minute representation of a short piece of his thinking on the Enlightenment and his dialectic method. That, however, has nothing to do with its utility and accuracy. Your point is irrelevant.

You, sir, with your confrontational approach, are a mockery of philosophy; each of us should have humility toward the practice of reasoning and quest to knowledge.

Halt yourself in the future. You are an embarrassment and a waste of words.

--

--

Jakub Ferencik
Jakub Ferencik

Written by Jakub Ferencik

Journalist living in Prague | Author of “Up in the Air” and “Beyond Reason” on AMAZON | MA McGill Uni | 750+ articles with 1+ mil. views

No responses yet